Monday, January 07, 2008

Will We be Able to Drink to That?

In today's Daily Breeze, there appeared an editorial that seems to agree with Councilman Dennis Zine's concern for water or lack there of.

As this issue will probably becoming more important to more residents, here is both the original article and the editorial that appears in the newspaper:

Water fears spark plan

CONSERVATION: An L.A. councilman wants to restrict development until limits are in place.

By Kerry Cavanaugh, Staff Writer

With water supplies getting tighter, one Los Angeles city councilman believes the city needs to consider blocking new residential development until regulations can be adopted to limit water use in new projects.

Councilman Dennis Zine said he offered the proposal because Angelenos have largely ignored Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's plea for voluntary water saving.

"It's a drastic step but we need to start discussing this," Zine said. "The more we build, the more water is consumed. The slower we are to act on it, the worse the consequences."

"How are we going to put some teeth in our water conservation?"

In a motion submitted last month, Zine asked city departments to consider a land-use policy that would require all new residential development to occupy a water-use "footprint" of 10 percent less than the previous usage of the property.

The Department of Water and Power and the Department of Building and Safety said they are looking at Zine's proposal.

Under state law, developers of more than 500 units must prove there is enough water for future residents, and so far the DWP has never rejected a project based on water shortfalls.

If the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California - which sells water to the DWP and other utilities - were to ration or dramatically cut supplies, then the DWP would reconsider its ability to provide for new customers, DWP Spokesman Joe Ramallo said.

"Over the last 20 years we have continued to meet water needs - despite a population increase of 1 million people - through strong conservation measures," Ramallo said.

Still, Los Angeles' water supply is getting tighter. Under environmental agreements, the DWP cannot take as much water from the Eastern Sierra. And pumping water from Northern California has been slowed to protect an endangered breed of fish.

Deputy Mayor Nancy Sutley questioned whether the city would need to stop new development, as Zine has suggested.

"We're just at the beginning of the winter," she said.

But Sutley did agree that L.A. needs a more comprehensive water conservation plan, and she pointed to the city's "green building" program aimed at saving water through building codes, landscaping requirements and water reuse.

"There are more options than just saying you must use less water," Sutley said. "We spend a lot of money putting potable water on our lawns. In some cases it makes as much sense to do your landscaping with recycled water than not using water at all."

Holly Schroeder of the Building Industry Association's Greater L.A. and Ventura Chapter said new developments generally include the most water-efficient toilets, washing machines and appliances that older homes do not have. And many new projects now incorporate drought-tolerant landscaping.

"We also have to remember we have a housing shortage," Schroeder said. "Are there better strategies for water conservation other than holding building permits, especially when you've made all these strides in development?"

Suggestion holds water

Daily Breeze Editorial

Monday January 7, 2008

Once again, West Valley City Councilman Dennis Zine stands alone among Los Angeles leaders in dealing seriously with the city's water crisis.

Don't let the last few days' storms fool you.

At best, L.A. is on pace for an average annual rainfall, which is far below what the region needs to end its drought.

With water from Northern California cut off due to environmental concerns - and with the city's voluntary water-reduction goals largely ignored - L.A.'s water shortage is greater than ever.

To which Zine hints at the possibility few others in City Hall will even acknowledge - moratorium.

At a time when Los Angeles might, like Long Beach before it, soon have to start rationing water, it defies reason to keep approving new developments that further stretch depleted resources.

Zine says L.A. may need to put a halt on future growth, or at least demand that new developments offer plans to use less water.

He is right. And if his peers in City Hall were as concerned with L.A.'s future as they were with developers' campaign contributions, they would agree.

No comments: