Sunday, October 15, 2006

A View From the Front Line

Glenn Cornell is the President of the Rolling Hills Riviera Homeowners Association.

Some members from the organization live in single-family homes directly across Western Avenue from the Ponte Vista site. These folks live in the City of Ranch Palos Verdes and technically not in San Pedro, where Ponte Vista is located. I feel residents of Rolling Hills Riviera have the largest stake, as homeowners, to whatever is built within Ponte Vista.

Glenn wrote a "President's Message" for the October, 2006 issue of "The Rolling Stones", which is the newsletter for the homeowners association. I have asked and been granted permission to print Mr. Cornell's message because I feel opinions from such important stakeholders, should be read.

President's Message
Elitists. You're elitists. I'm one, too. Although none of us thinks of ourselves that way, we are. Everyone who favors single family housing is an elitist -- at least according to Robert Bisno.
The Daily Breeze has been more than a little critical of Bisno Development's plans for the old Navy property. To its credit, it allowed the developer to reply. What followed was not a response from a "spokesman" or other P.R. type. Rather, an article entitled "The Truth about Ponte Vista" appeared on September 9 over the name of Mr. Bisno himself. If you missed it, I encourage you to rummage through your old newspapers for a copy. It is an eye opener.
Mr. Bisno, who happens to be an attorney, takes a handful of premises, assumes they are true, and then builds his article around them. His anchoring arguments are that that the San Pedro area needs "affordable" housing, that people in the area agree with this view, and that those who oppose his plans for 2300 condominiums on the property are elitists. Whew! Where to begin?
First, the tract is already zoned R-1. The officials responsible for that determination must suffer from "elitism" as well, since they have been concluding for years that single family homes represent the best use of the land in question. By Mr. Bisno's logic, all R-1 zoning is "elitist" because it prevents the construction of high density (and, presumably, lower cost) units. I am curious to know where Mr. Bisno lives. I suspect it is in an area that has many restrictions on land use; that is probably one of the very reasons he chose a home there.
Though affordability is a key part of his pitch, Mr. Bisno neglects to define the term. This is a significant lapse. What he means may well be quite different from what prospective buyers envision. He says he anticipates that the units will start in the "high $300,000's." That's hardly a firm commitment on his part. Moreover, we're not told the number of units which will be offered at that price or the price of the average unit. In face, if Mr. Bisno is to placate his financial backers, "affordable" will mean that he will charge the most the market will bear for every condo he is permitted to build. He would be and unusual real estate developer if he does not.
Mr. Bisno would no doubt counter that he has petition signatures which give the thumbs up to his plans. He refers to "4,800 supporters." What I am not clear about is what those supporters support. In recent months, I have had occasion to hear petition gatherers at Albertson's and Trader Joe's approach shoppers about supporting affordable housing in senior housing. What I never heard was a signature-gatherer ask anyone to support 2300 new condo units along Western Avenue. Indeed, I never heard any of the gatherers include that crucial fact in any of the comments they made to those who stopped and displayed any interest in their petition. It makes you wonder how many people would have lent their support to that petition.
I could go on, but you get the idea. 2300 new housing units in this area is an exceedingly bad idea. Mr. Bisno bought the property knowing it was zoned R-1. Evidently, he thought he could bend things to his will, get the zoning changed to allow a high-density development on the land, and thereby let him turn a bigger profit on the project. That was his gamble. If he wins, we will be the losers.
I'm sorry to report that Councilwoman Janice Hahn appears to be waffling on her commitment to keep the land zoned R-1. At a speech she delivered recently in San Pedro, she suggested that she is now open to allowing more units on the property than are permitted under the R-1 restriction. In August, I thought she had gotten the message and was prepared to stand by the current zoning. Perhaps, she has forgotten. If so, it is up to each of us to remind her. We don't want more traffic; we contend with far more than our share. We don't want more pollution; we have more than is healthy. Our infrastructure is stretched beyond its capacity already. Mr. Bisno doesn't live here. He won't have to figure out how to apply another patch when something fails. We're the ones who will be left to cope with the mess.
Thank you,
Glenn Cornell

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Mr Cornell made some excellent comments, in my opinion. His HOA has been on the front lines suffering untold hardships with the collapsing storm drain issues along Western Avenue and the continued presence of an L.A.U.S.D. middle school located in Rancho Palos Verdes, where none of the resident children need attend.

I think, for correct information's sake, I would like to share some items otherwise not explained in Mr. Cornell's message.
R-1 zoning equates to nine residences per acre.
"High density" is what most of us feel Mr. Bisno's plans are for. However, Mr. Bisno's plans actually call for "medium density" as defined by the Planning Department. Mr. Bisno has applied for a zoning change to build condos equating to "up to 55" units per acre. That number is also figured into the lots that will have no condos built on them, i.e. roadway lots, park space lots, and other types on non-housing lots. In the density figures, even public park land is factored into the overall density of the entire project.
Some of the lots in the application for zone change have more than 55 units per acre. Most have less. Taking into all the lots listed on the application, built up or not, the plan is for approximately 37 units per acre. This number is four times the density of R-1 zoning.

None of the "affordable" housing that Mr. Bisno is seeking to build fill any of the requirements for real affordable housing as outlined in government documents.

As a major stakeholder in anything built at Ponte Vista, I am hoping to read Mr. Cornell's opinions concerning the prospect of having a 2,025 seat senior high school built directly across Western Avenue from Rolling Hills Riviera. I am quite sure M Richards would post Glenn's comments on that project as well.

Anonymous said...

If the city of Los Angeles does not limit the density of Bisno Development's project, I believe a coalition should be formed to file suit against the developer. The coalition should include the city of RPV, and as many families as possible.

I know we are not there yet, but preparations should be made in the instance that the city green lights the project as is.